Monday, December 06, 2010

Welcome to HASSERS blog!

HASSERS are Humanist Atheist Scientific Secularist Ethical Rationalist Sceptics as defined in HASSERS 7 Statements (May 2008). HASSERS discuss issues concerning these topics on this blog, in our Google Forum and at meetings in Bournemouth, Dorset in England.

Read More...

Sunday, May 25, 2008

John Humphrys - Steve Jones definition of evil is crazy

In a Guardian article (May 2007) Steve Jones was in a discussion with Martin Rees and Richard Dawkins. Prof Jones discussed the problems he comes across when teaching students with Islamic backgrounds.

"To a man and to a woman, there are parts of science they will not accept.

"That means that, in their early lives, they have been told deliberate lies by people who, I'm sure, know they are deliberate lies. I don't care how charming they are, I don't care how pleasant they are, these people are evil.

"What's true for imams is, more or less, true for bishops."
Letters, May 30
Prof Steve Jones describes imams and bishops as "evil". Could he give us the scientific definition of evil?
Lizzi Collinge
Lancaster
http://www.guardian.co.uk/letters/story/0,,2090785,00.html

Steve Jones (Letters, May 31)
Lizzi Collinge (Letters, May 30) asks for my definition of "evil". How about "telling lies to children"; the universal habit of all religions through the ages?
Steve Jones
London
http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/2007/may/31/leadersandreply.mainsection

June 2, 2007 Letters
Lying to children is evil, says Steve Jones (Letters, May 31). So no more "you'll get well soon, darling", or "you'll love your spinach" or "once upon a time there was a little girl called Little Red Riding Hood". What a cold, dull, flat and colourless world of the imagination poor Steve and his buddies must inhabit. Give me the gods, the spirits, the myths and Father Christmas any time. They make science so much more interesting and valuable.
Ian Flintoff
Oxford
http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/2007/jun/02/leadersandreply.mainsection

Ian Flintoff misrepresents Steve Jones who was talking about the lies that relgions tell to children.
John Humphrys in this book "In God We Doubt" takes issue with Steve Jones (chapter 20) who says "evil by definition is teaching children things you know to be wrong" But Steve Jones (see May 31 Letters) actually said my definition of "evil". How about "telling lies to children"; the universal habit of all religions through the ages? Steve Jones was not talking about 'Little Red Riding' or other fairy tales; he was talking about the lies that religions teach children. Steve Jones was agreeing with Richard Dawkins that children should be taught ideas based on evidence not ideas based on faith.

John Humphrys asks is it really, honestly evil to teach children that "there was a good man called Jesus who was killed by some bad men but came alive again and then went to heaven because he was really the son of God and loved us all.

Is it really crazy to think that it might be evil to say to children that "Jesus went to heaven because he was the son of God". That is a matter of faith and not based on any credible evidence. If you know that something as fundamental as this is (in all likelyhood) wrong then you should not be teaching it to children. Instead we should be teaching children ideas that are based on evidence.

Read More...

We should strive for peaceful co-existence with the mainstream religions.

Scientists divided over alliance with religion

· Rees sees main faiths as help in extremism fight
· Dawkins warns against 'buying into fiction'

Scientists should form a closer alliance with mainstream religion in order to better fight extremism, the president of the Royal Society said yesterday.

Speaking at a debate at the Guardian Hay festival, Martin Rees, the Astronomer Royal who heads the Royal Society, said that science needed as many allies as it could find in the current climate.

"If we give the impression that science is hostile to even mainstream religion, it will be more difficult to combat the kinds of anti-science sentiments that are really important,"
he said.
"We need people like that as allies in dealing with extreme fundamentalism."

His fellow panellists, evolutionists Richard Dawkins and Steve Jones, disagreed. Prof Dawkins said that, though he had cooperated with the recently-retired Bishop of Oxford, Richard Harries, to complain about allowing creationists to set up schools, he urged a limit.

"If we are too friendly to nice, decent bishops, we run the risk of buying into the fiction that there's something virtuous about believing things because of faith rather than because of evidence. We run the risk of betraying scientific enlightenment."

Bishops themselves never killed anybody, but possibly made the world safer for "people who do kill people by extolling the virtues of faith as opposed to reason and evidence".

Prof Jones discussed the problems he comes across when teaching students with Islamic backgrounds.

"To a man and to a woman, there are parts of science they will not accept.

"That means that, in their early lives, they have been told deliberate lies by people who, I'm sure, know they are deliberate lies. I don't care how charming they are, I don't care how pleasant they are, these people are evil.

"What's true for imams is, more or less, true for bishops."

Lord Rees went on to point out potential threats to science. "There are new kinds of extreme views that are separate from religion - there are many strange cults that I find potentially terrifying." He cited the Raelian cult as an example, members of which believe that their leader came from outer space and are attempting to clone humans, saying: "They would say they are on the side of science. People like the Raelians show that we're kidding ourselves if we think that a scientific education makes people rational."

Cults allied to technology in this way could be dangerous. "You can imagine eco-groups who imagine the world would be better off without human beings. We need to combat these new irrationalities and, in doing this we should seek allies wherever we can, and I think allies do include people who call themselves religious.

We should strive for peaceful co-existence with the mainstream religions."

Read More...

Saturday, May 24, 2008

Humanists appointed to new Government steering group on Religious Education

After many years of urging by the BHA and many others, the Government has now announced a revision of the notorious ‘Circular 1/94’, the official guidance on RE and on SACREs (the local bodies which oversee RE in each local authority - Standing Advisory Council for RE). The process will be guided by a steering group of thirty representatives of different organisations with interest and expertise in RE and we are very pleased that the BHA has two places on this steering group.

They will be filled by Andrew Copson, BHA Director of Education and Public Affairs and Marilyn Mason, former BHA Education Officer. Over the next 18 months, this group will meet to discuss the many issues to be engaged by the new guidance. Mr Copson commented,

‘Circular 1/94 is the document which is invariably used to exclude humanists from full membership of SACREs and also lays an undue emphasis on Christianity in general and religions in particular which the BHA believes is seriously out of step with contemporary best practice in the teaching about religions and non-religious beliefs.
We are looking forward to working on the steering group to reform these outmoded aspects of the official guidance.’

Read More...

BHA joins in parliamentary call for children’s right to withdraw from school worship

The British Humanist Association (BHA) has called on the Government to support today’s report from Parliament’s Joint Committee on Human Rights which calls for any child of ‘sufficient maturity, intelligence and understanding’ to be given the right to withdraw from compulsory religious worship in schools.

Currently, only sixth form students have the right to withdraw themselves, and other children can only be withdrawn at the request of their parents,

but the Human Rights Committee have said that this violates children’s rights to freedom of belief and conscience.


Writing in support of the Committee’s report to Minister for Schools and Learners, Jim Knight MP, the BHA said, ‘ We agree with the JCHR that the law is clearly inconsistent with the European Convention on Human Rights and that
children of ‘sufficient maturity, intelligence and understanding’ should be permitted to withdraw themselves from prayer and other worship.’
Andrew Copson, BHA Director of Education and Public Affairs, commented,
‘The best situation would be the replacement of the law requiring religious worship with a law requiring inclusive assemblies that would be suitable for all children. For as long as the current law remains, however, children must be allowed to decide for themselves whether they wish to participate. To compel them to pray, or worship in other ways, is a clear interference with their right to freedom of belief – one of the most important rights that we enjoy.’

Read More...